Malaysian Court Upholds Right to Convert from Islam

 

 

In a landmark ruling last week a Malaysian court upheld the rights of a Christian to convert from Islam.

 

The judgment establishes a precedent in a country where religious conversions, particularly from Islam to Christianity, have been steeped in controversy.

 

The verdict reaffirms the supremacy of the Federal Constitution, which under Article 11 defends every Malaysian citizen’s right to freedom of religion.

 

For Rooney Rebit, the plaintiff, the decision could not have come at a more opportune time than in Holy Week: he was asking judicial authorities to declare that his belief in Jesus Christ was a fundamental human right.

 

The High Court in Kuching, Sarawak state, duly agreed. The judge, Yew Ken Jie, said: “He is free to exercise his right of freedom to religion and he chose Christianity.”

 

Rebit was born into a Christian family in 1975 but his parents converted to Islam when he was eight years old. His Muslim name was Azmi Mohamad Azam Shah.

 

In 1999, Rebit embraced Christianity and was baptised.

 

In her decision, Judge Yew ruled that Rebit could not be considered to have officially professed Islam, because it was not his choice to embrace the religion. But when he became a Christian at the age of 24, he was mature enough to make a conscious decision.

 

Apostasy

 

Cases of conversion in Malaysia have been plagued by official dissension and charges of apostasy by Muslim authorities challenging verdicts by secular courts in Sharia tribunals.

 

The most prominent suit involved Lina Joy who converted from Islam to Christianity in 1998 at the age of 26; her application to have her conversion legally recognised by Malaysian courts was rejected in 2007 after a six-year legal battle.

 

There have been other cases where one parent has converted children born into a different faith community to Islam, when the appeals of the other parent, usually the mother, have been brushed aside by Islamic authorities who espouse the supremacy of Islam.

 

In this video, Malaysian lawyer Andrew Khoo discuss the recent case of a Hindu mother who challenged her husband’s ‘unilateral’ conversion of their two children to Islam: in failing to rule on this, the Federal court left the issue unresolved for Malaysia’s minority faiths.

 

In a country with two parallel legal systems, appeals to secular courts to right such wrongs are inevitably referred to the Sharia authorities, where non-Muslim lawyers are barred from practising.

 

In Rebit’s case the significant difference was that he was not challenging his conversion to Islam; for if he had done so, the case would have had to be judged by the Sharia court - because secular courts have ruled that they do not have jurisdiction on Islamic issues.

 

Rebit, in his application, asked that he be officially declared a Christian, and for the Sarawak Islamic Religious Department and Sarawak Islamic Council to release him from the Muslim faith. He also wanted the court to compel the Government’s National Registration Department to change his name and religion on his identity card and its records.

 

Sarawak state’s Islamic religious authorities did not object to issuing the letter releasing him from his faith, but the registration department had insisted on a letter of release and order from the Sharia Court. But Judge Yew, in her decision, ordered the National Registration Department to make the changes to Rebit’s’s identity card.

 

She held that Rebit’s case was not one of jurisdiction, but raised constitutional issues regarding his right to religious freedom. “He does not need a Sharia court order to release him from Islam, because freedom of religion is his constitutional right and only he can exercise that right.”

 

She added: “His conversion to the Muslim faith was not of his own volition but by virtue of his parents’ conversion when he was a minor. He is not challenging the validity of his conversion as a minor. But having become a major, he is free to exercise his right of freedom to religion and he chose Christianity. The National Registration Department had not acted fairly towards the applicant by insisting on a letter of release and order from the Sharia Court.”

 

Ruling upholds constitutional rights

 

Rebit’s’s lawyer, Chua Kuan Ching, welcomed the decision and hoped that the National Registration Department would not appeal the judgment. “In previous conversion cases involving minors, the courts did not go far enough to state what happens when the child reaches adulthood. So this is a different decision because the judge is saying that he has the right to religious freedom, according to the Constitution.”

 

The Association of Churches in Sarawak applauded the ruling for protecting the fundamental right to freedom of religion, especially “with Holy Week upon us and Easter nearing”:

 

“We call upon the Federal Government [in Kuala Lumpur] to honour and give effect to the guarantee of religious freedom as provided in the Malaysia Agreement [which formed the basis of Sarawak and Sabah state’s union with Malaysia] and uphold the constitutional rights and fundamental liberties accorded by the Federal Constitution to all citizens of Malaysia.”

 

Sisters in Islam, a civil society group committed to promoting democratic rights within the framework of Islam and universal human rights, also welcomed the decision. Their organisation, which has come under criticism from Islamic authorities for its opposition to attempts to prosecute Muslims for attempting to leave Islam, said the judgment reaffirmed the supremacy of the Federal Constitution.

 

“As such, it is our duty to honour these rights equally and fairly, without regard to race or religion. Where our legal system provides for the right of conversion, it should not be the case that in reality the practice of these rights are denied, or made nearly impossible, to certain religions or races,” it said in a statement issued yesterday [Monday, March 28th 2016].

 

It also added: “Acting in the interest of our country and its people does not conflict with the principles of Islam as Islam is a religion of compassion and tolerance … Faith cannot be imposed through enforcement. Instead, faith is contingent upon free will. Islam itself means submission to the will of God – not the will of men.” The organisation said the judgment was a reminder to all Malaysians of their right to practise their faith without coercion from the state.

 

MALAYSIAN LAWYER REFLECTS ON 'ALLAH' CASE IMPLICATIONS FOR CHRISTIANS

The latest ruling offers relief to the beleaguered Christian community, who make up nine per cent of the 30 million population. They have increasingly felt their faith under attack; in recent years Bibles in the Malay language have been seized, churches and the Catholic Herald newspaper barred from using the word ‘Allah’ to describe God, and places of worship desecrated.

 

In this video, a Malaysian lawyer discusses the recent ‘Allah’ case. Andrew Khoo represented the Council of Churches of Malaysia in the long-running case.

 

BACKGROUND

For about eight years, Malaysia has been ruled by the right-wing Barisan Nasional party, led by Prime Minister Najib Razak, who managed to win a second term in 2013, though with a narrow margin, pitting Muslims against minorities. Andrew Khoo, an elected member of the Malaysia Bar Council and co-chair of the country’s Human Rights Committee, explained what Razak’s win means for Christians and described the overall religious freedom scene in the country before this latest Sarawak case.  

 

 

Courtesy: World Watch Monitor

LATEST POLL: Do you talk about your faith on social media? Weigh in → World Religion News Logo Religion News Religions Featured Contributors Video Culture Ethics Issues Opinion Atheist Richard Dawkins: Christianity Has the Power to Defeat Radical Islam date icon 18 Jan 2016 author icon Posted by Gary Nguyen Dawkins Richard Dawkins now feels that Christianity could defeat radical Islam. Richard Dawkins, who is known all over the world to be a very strict atheist, as well as the author of the very famous and best-selling book The God Delusion had made certain comments about Christianity in the year 2010. He said that Christianity can be the best defense for fighting against all the Islamic jihad that is taking place all over the world. Atheist Richard Dawkins: Christianity Has the Power to Defeat Radical Islam Tweet This Richard Dawkins’ comments can be seen resurfacing again on social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook. Even though in his book he has compared the teachings of Christianity to that of sexual abuse, he tends to have changed his statements to fall in place with the current circumstances. According to him, the teachings which have been outlined in the Bible and conveyed by Jesus do not promote or encourage violence. It also does not lead to suicide bombings being attempted. Therefore, Dawkins now feels that Christianity might be the best defense for people if they would like to win the war against radical Islam. Richard Dawkins tries to justify his opinion by saying that in modern times, we do not find any Christians who are engaging in violent behavior or even encouraging it. In addition, we also do not see Christians killing people or blowing up buildings. He is also not aware of any kind of ruling in Christianity in which apostasy should be punished by death. Even though he has mixed feelings about why Christianity has been declining in today’s times, he still has hope that it can be used to combat something far worse. Even though Richard Dawkins is now being seen to be in favor of Christianity, he was not like that before. In fact, he himself had admitted that he has criticized Christianity in the past. His reason for targeting Christianity is because it is the only religion in the world with which he is most familiar with. When he was young, living in Africa, he attended Christian schools. When he was just nine years old, he and his family shifted and set up their home in England. After the move, his hatred towards Christianity increased when he encountered sexual abuse while he was in school. Even though it left a psychological effect on him for the long run, it was nothing compared to how he felt while growing up in a home which was so dedicated to the Catholic beliefs. After that, he pursued the field of biology with the help and support of his parents. It is from there that he started developing his atheist beliefs as he tried to reason everything with science and logic. Despite all this, Dawkins feels that he is often misunderstood and hence criticized by the public and media. But now, thanks to his recent comments, many new discussions are opening up amongst both Christians and atheists alike. Resources Christian Today Amazon –The God Delusion Follow the Conversation on Twitter The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and are not necessarily those of World Religion News. Tags: facebook, ISIL, jihad, Richard Dawkins, Sexual Abuse, The God Delusion, twitter Share This Subscribe to updates Your Email Address RSS Feed Newsletter Related Posts Donald Trump is Gaining Support from Hindus, Muslims, and Sikhs March 15, 2016 Facebook Shuts Down, Then Restores Pages of Arab Atheists and Secularists February 28, 2016 “Hijabis of New York” Photos Highlight the Successes of Muslim Women January 31, 2016 Most Popular News Dawkins Atheist Richard Dawkins: Christianity Has the Power to Defeat Radical Islam by Gary Nguyen Religious Trauma Syndrome What is Religious Trauma Syndrome? by Alison Lesley JesusResurrected 7 Pieces of Evidence That Jesus Was Resurrected from the Dead by Elisa Meyer poperock Spotify Launches Ad Campaign Featuring Pope Francis by Alison Lesley Download the World Religion News App Download the World Religion News App on iTunesDownload the World Religion News App on Google Play Subscribe to updates Your Email Address RSS Feed Newsletter World Religion News Agnosticism Anglicanism Atheism Bahá’í Faith Baptist Buddhism Catholicism Christianity Eastern Orthodoxy Evangelicalism Hinduism Islam Jainism Judaism Lutheranism Methodism Mormonism Oriental Orthodoxy Presbyterianism Scientology Shinto Sikhism Taoism Wicca Recent Religion News Bangladesh Rejects Petition; Islam to be Official Religion March 29, 2016 Across Mexico, Effigies of Donald Trump Burned on Easter March 29, 2016 Pope Francis Condemns “Cowardly” Attack that Killed 70+ Pakistani Christians March 29, 2016 ©2016 WorldReligionNews.com | About | Contact Us | Site Policies | Terms and Conditions | Disclaimer If you’re a publisher and wish to have your content removed, click here. AddThis Sharing 2.6K 146 Recommended for you The Quran Does Not Oppress Women, Sharia-Based Islam Does - World Religion News The Quran Does Not Oppress Women, Sharia-Based Islam Do... www.worldreligionnews.com Mormonism News - World Religion News www.worldreligionnews.com Muslims Stand Up to ISIS with Social Media Campaign #NotInMyName - World Religion News Muslims Stand Up to ISIS with Social Media Campaign #NotInMyNa... www.worldreligionnews.com AddThis

Read more at World Religion News: "Atheist Richard Dawkins: Christianity Has the Power to Defeat Radical Islam" http://www.worldreligionnews.com/?p=22827

In a landmark ruling last week a Malaysian court upheld the rights of a Christian to convert from Islam.

 

The judgment establishes a precedent in a country where religious conversions, particularly from Islam to Christianity, have been steeped in controversy.

 

The verdict reaffirms the supremacy of the Federal Constitution, which under Article 11 defends every Malaysian citizen’s right to freedom of religion.

 

For Rooney Rebit, the plaintiff, the decision could not have come at a more opportune time than in Holy Week: he was asking judicial authorities to declare that his belief in Jesus Christ was a fundamental human right.

 

The High Court in Kuching, Sarawak state, duly agreed. The judge, Yew Ken Jie, said: “He is free to exercise his right of freedom to religion and he chose Christianity.”

 

Rebit was born into a Christian family in 1975 but his parents converted to Islam when he was eight years old. His Muslim name was Azmi Mohamad Azam Shah.

 

In 1999, Rebit embraced Christianity and was baptised.

 

In her decision, Judge Yew ruled that Rebit could not be considered to have officially professed Islam, because it was not his choice to embrace the religion. But when he became a Christian at the age of 24, he was mature enough to make a conscious decision.

 

Apostasy

 

Cases of conversion in Malaysia have been plagued by official dissension and charges of apostasy by Muslim authorities challenging verdicts by secular courts in Sharia tribunals.

 

The most prominent suit involved Lina Joy who converted from Islam to Christianity in 1998 at the age of 26; her application to have her conversion legally recognised by Malaysian courts was rejected in 2007 after a six-year legal battle.

 

There have been other cases where one parent has converted children born into a different faith community to Islam, when the appeals of the other parent, usually the mother, have been brushed aside by Islamic authorities who espouse the supremacy of Islam.

 

In this video, Malaysian lawyer Andrew Khoo discuss the recent case of a Hindu mother who challenged her husband’s ‘unilateral’ conversion of their two children to Islam: in failing to rule on this, the Federal court left the issue unresolved for Malaysia’s minority faiths.

 

In a country with two parallel legal systems, appeals to secular courts to right such wrongs are inevitably referred to the Sharia authorities, where non-Muslim lawyers are barred from practising.

 

In Rebit’s case the significant difference was that he was not challenging his conversion to Islam; for if he had done so, the case would have had to be judged by the Sharia court - because secular courts have ruled that they do not have jurisdiction on Islamic issues.

 

Rebit, in his application, asked that he be officially declared a Christian, and for the Sarawak Islamic Religious Department and Sarawak Islamic Council to release him from the Muslim faith. He also wanted the court to compel the Government’s National Registration Department to change his name and religion on his identity card and its records.

 

Sarawak state’s Islamic religious authorities did not object to issuing the letter releasing him from his faith, but the registration department had insisted on a letter of release and order from the Sharia Court. But Judge Yew, in her decision, ordered the National Registration Department to make the changes to Rebit’s’s identity card.

 

She held that Rebit’s case was not one of jurisdiction, but raised constitutional issues regarding his right to religious freedom. “He does not need a Sharia court order to release him from Islam, because freedom of religion is his constitutional right and only he can exercise that right.”

 

She added: “His conversion to the Muslim faith was not of his own volition but by virtue of his parents’ conversion when he was a minor. He is not challenging the validity of his conversion as a minor. But having become a major, he is free to exercise his right of freedom to religion and he chose Christianity. The National Registration Department had not acted fairly towards the applicant by insisting on a letter of release and order from the Sharia Court.”

 

Ruling upholds constitutional rights

 

Rebit’s’s lawyer, Chua Kuan Ching, welcomed the decision and hoped that the National Registration Department would not appeal the judgment. “In previous conversion cases involving minors, the courts did not go far enough to state what happens when the child reaches adulthood. So this is a different decision because the judge is saying that he has the right to religious freedom, according to the Constitution.”

 

The Association of Churches in Sarawak applauded the ruling for protecting the fundamental right to freedom of religion, especially “with Holy Week upon us and Easter nearing”:

 

“We call upon the Federal Government [in Kuala Lumpur] to honour and give effect to the guarantee of religious freedom as provided in the Malaysia Agreement [which formed the basis of Sarawak and Sabah state’s union with Malaysia] and uphold the constitutional rights and fundamental liberties accorded by the Federal Constitution to all citizens of Malaysia.”

 

Sisters in Islam, a civil society group committed to promoting democratic rights within the framework of Islam and universal human rights, also welcomed the decision. Their organisation, which has come under criticism from Islamic authorities for its opposition to attempts to prosecute Muslims for attempting to leave Islam, said the judgment reaffirmed the supremacy of the Federal Constitution.

 

“As such, it is our duty to honour these rights equally and fairly, without regard to race or religion. Where our legal system provides for the right of conversion, it should not be the case that in reality the practice of these rights are denied, or made nearly impossible, to certain religions or races,” it said in a statement issued yesterday [Monday, March 28th 2016].

 

It also added: “Acting in the interest of our country and its people does not conflict with the principles of Islam as Islam is a religion of compassion and tolerance … Faith cannot be imposed through enforcement. Instead, faith is contingent upon free will. Islam itself means submission to the will of God – not the will of men.” The organisation said the judgment was a reminder to all Malaysians of their right to practise their faith without coercion from the state.

 

MALAYSIAN LAWYER REFLECTS ON 'ALLAH' CASE IMPLICATIONS FOR CHRISTIANS

The latest ruling offers relief to the beleaguered Christian community, who make up nine per cent of the 30 million population. They have increasingly felt their faith under attack; in recent years Bibles in the Malay language have been seized, churches and the Catholic Herald newspaper barred from using the word ‘Allah’ to describe God, and places of worship desecrated.

 

In this video, a Malaysian lawyer discusses the recent ‘Allah’ case. Andrew Khoo represented the Council of Churches of Malaysia in the long-running case.

 

BACKGROUND

For about eight years, Malaysia has been ruled by the right-wing Barisan Nasional party, led by Prime Minister Najib Razak, who managed to win a second term in 2013, though with a narrow margin, pitting Muslims against minorities. Andrew Khoo, an elected member of the Malaysia Bar Council and co-chair of the country’s Human Rights Committee, explained what Razak’s win means for Christians and described the overall religious freedom scene in the country before this latest Sarawak case.  

 

 

Courtesy: World Watch Monitor

According to him, the teachings which have been outlined in the Bible and conveyed by Jesus do not promote or encourage violence. It also does not lead to suicide bombings being attempted. Therefore, Dawkins now feels that Christianity might be the best defense for people if they would like to win the war against radical Islam. Richard Dawkins tries to justify his opinion by saying that in modern times, we do not find any Christians who are engaging in violent behavior or even encouraging it. In addition, we also do not see Christians killing people or blowing up buildings. He is also not aware of any kind of ruling in Christianity in which apostasy should be punished by death. Even though he has mixed feelings about why Christianity has been declining in today’s times, he still has hope that it can be used to combat something far worse. Even though Richard Dawkins is now being seen to be in favor of Christianity, he was not like that before. In fact, he himself had admitted that he has criticized Christianity in the past. His reason for targeting Christianity is because it is the only religion in the world with which he is most familiar with. When he was young, living in Africa, he attended Christian schools. When he was just nine years old, he and his family shifted and set up their home in England. After the move, his hatred towards Christianity increased when he encountered sexual abuse while he was in school. Even though it left a psychological effect on him for the long run, it was nothing compared to how he felt while growing up in a home which was so dedicated to the Catholic beliefs. After that, he pursued the field of biology with the help and support of his parents. It is from there that he started developing his atheist beliefs as he tried to reason everything with science and logic. Despite all this, Dawkins feels that he is often misunderstood and hence criticized by the public and media. But now, thanks to his recent comments, many new discussions are opening up amongst both Christians and atheists alike. Resources Christian Today Amazon –The God Delusion

Read more at World Religion News: "Atheist Richard Dawkins: Christianity Has the Power to Defeat Radical Islam" http://www.worldreligionnews.com/?p=22827