Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu
The decision of the Federal Government to start investigation on
how the 2014 and 2015 budgetary allocations of the National Assembly
were expended has created panic in some quarters.
On Friday the the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission had
demanded details of the budgets totalling N300bn from the National
Assembly clerk, Sani Omolori. He was also mandated to produce details of
the contracts awarded by the assembly.
Following this development, some principal officers of the seventh
and the current eighth National Assembly would be invited in the coming
months for interrogation.
It would be recalled that a former Chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on Appropriation, Mr. Abdulmumin Jibrin, alleged padding of the 2016 budget, but the EFCC is extending its investigations to 2014 and 2015 fiscal years.
Jibrin, in his petition, had alleged that the Speaker of the House,
Mr. Yakubu Dogara and three other principal officers padded the 2016
budget.
A top official of the EFCC confided in Saturday PUNCH that although
Jibrin’s petition bothered on the 2016 budget, funds had not been
released for the projects allegedly inserted in the budget.
The principal officers including the then Senate President, Senator
David Mark, and his Deputy, Ike Ekweremadu, would be invited by the
commission for questioning.
For the eight National Assembly, besides Dogara, the current Senate
President, Dr.Bukola Saraki; Ekweremadu and the Deputy Speaker,
Sulaiman Lasun, will also be quizzed, Punch reports.
The official stated, “You know the National Assembly has never
made its budget public. Besides Jibrin’s petitions, there are others
that will make investigations into the 2014 and 2015 budgets
inevitable.”
However, the Deputy Chairman, Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs,
Senator Shehu Sani, revealed that the probe is the same as meddling in
the affairs of the legislature by the executive.
He noted that the security and anti-graft agencies are arms of the
executive. He asked why the agencies were not paying attention to the
executive and the judiciary.
Sani said, “The anti-corruption agencies are showing more
interest in allegations against members of the National Assembly than
against members of the executive and the judiciary. And the
discriminatory responses of the anti-corruption agencies are an ill wind
that will blow no one any good. It simply discredits the agencies as
well as raise suspicions on their activities.
“The National Assembly is not immune to the law that is
applicable to anybody in this country but the anti-corruption agencies
must respect the independence of the legislature and seek an informed
opinion whenever they are delving into issues that concern the
legislature because they are still seen as part of the executive. They
must know that any of their actions, naturally, will be interpreted as a
calculated attempt to undermine the activities of the National
Assembly.
The lawmaker, who is representing Kaduna-Central at the Senate, however, added that no legislature should “in
any way take advantage of its esteemed position and the privileges of
its esteemed position to commit crime with the expectation of immunity
or impunity.”
No comments:
Post a Comment