Religious leaders in the UK are being warned to increase security at churches - and avoid wearing dog collars in public - as they are at high risk of being targeted by extremists.
New counter terrorism advice is being urgently issued to vicars and churches across the UK this week over fears an attack on British religious institutions is now likely.The new measures follow the murder of a priest by two ISIS terrorists in France last month, amid fears the same could now happen in the UK.
Experts warn that a terrorist attack on churches "is coming." Places of worship in the UK, which are 'easy targets' for extremists, are now being urged to take precautions and beef up security.
A draft of the measures being issued and seen by Mirror Online - called Counter Terrorism Advice for Churches - urges religious leaders to prepare for incidents and to be on alert for attackers, who are likely to be armed with knives.
Getty
The slaying has prompted guidance for religious institutions in the UK to be rewritten.
This is being done by former police officer Nick Tolson, who has advised the Home Office on counter-terrorism measures since 2012. He is writing the measures for National Churchwatch - which produces personal safety advice to people who work at places of worship.
"Churches in the past were considered low risk - now we know an attack is coming... and churches are one of the easy targets.
"It's likely to be a knife - not a machine gun, but we are covering that too."
REUTERS
"They are at risk, it only takes seconds for someone to stab a large number of people as we have seen."
It also advises religious leaders how to handle Sunday School children who may get separated from their parents in the event of an attack.
It continues: "Obviously the safety of children is paramount and understandably the parents will be frantic."
Getty
It says: "It does not matter whether they have a pistol, rifle or a machine gun. A firearm will kill a large number of people very quickly."
Reuters
- Preparing for a terrorist attack
- CCTV, alarms and controlling entrances
- Challenging suspicious people
- Dealing with disturbances during services
- Getting distance from the attacker or scene of the incident
- Taking cover in the event of 'gunfire or explosions'.
Adam Gerrard / Daily Mirror
Mr Tolson is the Christian representative on the Places of Worship Security Committee at the Counter Extremism Directorate at the Home Office. Other members of the committee are Sikh, Muslim and Hindu.
He is updating the Government's 2009 document 'Counter terrorism protective security advice for places of worship' - which he describes as "terribly outdated" and "impractical" and "written by people who don't work in a church".
Getty
"If you saw (the attacks) in Nice the police were shouting to run - the new guidance is about getting distance."
The advice details "examples of good cover" in the event of an attack, which includes hiding behind substantial brickwork and the bases of large live trees. It advises against concealing yourself behind car doors and wooden fences.
However Mr Tolson insists churches need to continue to operate in the community and be "open."
REUTERS
He added: "When I ask why, they says it's because they don't want to be identified, but if you stop people wearing them they feel their faith is challenged.
"It's about teaching people to react to the situation in front of them."
Getty
- Not to wear dog collars in public which identify them as being in the clergy
- Not to be in their church alone by themselves at any time
- To beef up security at their church - despite concerns over the cost
Adam Gerrard / Daily Mirror
"I've also been told to not be in the church by myself - but it would cost me too much to pay someone to come with me to open up every day.
"There are government schemes you can apply for funding to improve security but you have to contribute 20% - I know that would bankrupt my church and I can't risk that."
Churches in the UK have insisted they will remain open to all despite the threat of attack.
PA
The Deputy Assistant Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Neil Basu QPM, wrote to UK church congregations as a direct response to "the terrible murder of Father Jacques Hamel in France".
In his letter he wrote: "We are again reminded of the indiscriminate nature of terrorism and the brutal and senseless actions of these criminals."
He added: "Church leaders and their congregations here in the UK should remain alert not alarmed.
Getty
"However I know these are troubling times and it makes sense for all church leaders to review their security plans and to encourage their flock to be vigilant."
On the same day as the Normandy murder - by coincidence - the Government announced "funding is available to places of worship stop hate crimes".
Churches, mosques and temples have also been invited to bid for grants from the £2.4million fund "if they can show that they are at risk of attack from religious hate crimes".
The scheme covers security equipment - but not the cost of recruiting security personnel.
It can include money for:
- CCTV systems
- perimeter fencing and intruder alarms
- security doors and access gates
- bollards, locks and external lighting
Synagogues are exempt from the scheme as they can apply for a separate grant from the Community Security Trust - a charity that provides protection services to Britain’s Jewish communities.
The scheme was launched by home affairs minister Amber Rudd as she outlined a Hate Crime Action Plan.
Dan Kitwood
“Well, I have a very clear message for them. We will not stand for it. Hatred has no place whatsoever in a 21st century Great Britain that works for everyone.
“We are Great Britain because we are united by values such as democracy, free speech, mutual respect and opportunity for all.
"We are the sum of all our parts - a proud, diverse society. Hatred does not get a seat at the table, and we will do everything we can to stamp it out.”
Dan Kitwood
At the Church of England’s General Synod in York in July - before the attack - he said: “It is perfectly clear that the result and the referendum campaign had “exposed deep divisions in our society, of which we were aware already.
“The result [of the referendum] has released a latent racism and xenophobia in all sectors, and challenges the prevailing consensus of tolerance and acceptance, thus threatening other areas of welcome liberalisation."
No comments:
Post a Comment