A
woman who had the nerve to try to drug her own daughter so that a man
can r*pe her, is being made to pay for her criminal act.
Stuart Bailey planned with the little girl's mother to rape her
A British woman shocked many people when she plotted to drug her own 7-year-old daughter for a paedophile to r*pe her.
She has however been jailed for nine years after being convicted.
Accoridng to Metro UK, the mother, who cannot be named for legal
reason, planned a s*x attack on the girl with Stuart Bailey in a series
of ‘depraved’ text messages, Cardiff Crown Court heard.
She also sent the 54-year-old a n*ked picture of the youngster and bought sleeping pills to drug her.
The court heard that the pair exchanged dozens of messages and the
offences only came to light when the woman’s partner found the messages
on her phone and reported her.
Bailey, who was jailed for a total of 13 years, and the woman were
found guilty of conspiracy to rape a girl aged under 13 after a trial in
December.
Bailey, of Rhydyfelin, Pontypridd, South Wales, was also convicted
of encouraging the distribution of indecent photographs of a child and
encouraging the sexual assault of a child by another woman.
At an earlier hearing the woman admitted distributing five indecent
images of a child and Bailey admitted possessing those images.
The judge, Recorder of Cardiff Eleri Rees QC, said Bailey was
‘prolific’ in contacting a number of women on the dating website Plenty
Of Fish.
She said a ‘pattern emerged’ whereby Bailey quickly turned to
talking about ‘perverted and unlawful’ sexual activity, seeing how far
he could push the women.
‘The discussion, unless cut short by the women, would then escalate
to you encouraging them to (engage in) sexual activity with children,
she said.
Officers began investigating in June last year after the mother’s
then partner found ‘to his disgust’ the messages and she was arrested,
Judge Rees added.
The investigation led to Bailey, who, it was discovered, was having similar discussions with other women.
Judge Rees said of the pair: ‘You met once face to face for s*x. During that encounter you, Bailey, saw a photograph of (the woman’s daughter).’
The mother later posed her daughter n*ked in the bath, exposing her genitals, to take pictures to send to Bailey.
Another image showed the girl in school uniform with her underwear exposed, the court heard.
Judge Rees added that the pair claimed they never had any intent to
carry out the content of their ‘depraved discussions of a perverted
sexual nature’.
The mother, who was described as ‘vulnerable and gullible’
by Judge Rees, asked Bailey at one point what she would get out of the
plan to rape her daughter and Bailey responded by mentioning sums of
£200 to £300.
The pair planned to rape the girl during the Whitsun school holiday and talked about drugging her.
Judge Rees said that despite speaking to her GP, who advised
against giving a child melatonin, the mother went ahead and bought some
online.
‘By your own admission you tried it out a week before the rape was due to take place,’ she added.
Lucy Crowther, for Bailey, said her client was ‘totally ashamed
of his behaviour and his actions, which he acknowledges will affect his
grown-up children and his partner, who is currently standing by him’.
Alex Greenwood, defending the mother, said social services had
identified her as a person at risk of being manipulated by men prior to
the offences and that was what had happened.
He added that she had been ‘bullied, cajoled and blackmailed’ by Bailey.
Both defendants were made the subject of sexual harm prevention orders and given one year of additional licence to serve.
A spokesman for the NSPCC Wales said: ‘A parent should protect
their child from harm rather than being complicit in their suffering at
the hands of paedophiles like Bailey.
‘It is right that both the mother and Bailey have received
significant sentences. This should send out a message that the sexual
abuse of children will not be tolerated, and that those caught planning
such heinous crimes will face the full force of the law.’
No comments:
Post a Comment