A
dramatic incident played out in court on Friday when a convicted
Managing Director of an oil firm fainted in court as judgement was about
being pronounced on her.
*Photo used for illustrative purpose*
A serious drama played out in court on Friday as the Managing
Director of Ontario Oil and Gas Limited, Mrs. Ada Ugo-Ngali, fainted at
the Lagos State High Court in Ikeja after being convicted of N754m oil
subsidy scam by the court.
The woman slumped while standing in the dock as Justice Lateefa
Okunnu was delivering judgment in a N1.9bn subsidy scam trial in which
she and three others where defendants.
The prosecuting counsel for the Economic and Financial Crimes
Commission, Mr. Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), had pointed out to the judge that
the offence carried a seven-year jail term and urged the judge to impose
the maximum sentence.
But before the judge could pronounce the sentence, Ugo-Ngali passed
out. The woman's lawyers and loved ones rushed to her aid as Justice
Okunnu, noting the state of things, adjourned the case and reserved her
pronouncement on the sentence till January 16.
As she regained consciousness, Ugo-Ngali was panting loudly while
her lawyers frantically called for medical personnel and an ambulance to
take her to the hospital. The convict was eventually carried out of the
courtroom by her lawyers and loved ones into a waiting black jeep which
sped out of the court premises.
Ontario Oil and Gas Limited; its Chairman, Mr. Walter Wagbatsoma;
Ngo-Ngali; and an official of the Petroleum Products Price and
Regulatory Agency, Mr. Babafemi Fakuade, had been arraigned by the EFCC
on August 1, 2013.
The EFCC, in the eight counts pressed against them, alleged that
they were involved in a N1.9bn fuel subsidy scam. The charges centred on
conspiracy, obtaining property by false pretences, forgery and
uttering.
Justice Okunnu found Wagbatsoma and Ngo-Ngali guilty, holding that
they defrauded the Federal Government to the tune of N754m in oil
subsidy transactions totalling N1.7bn.
The judge, however, discharged and acquitted Fakuade, holding the charge of forgery brought against him was not sustainable.
“The case against the third defendant is that he helped in
forging the Shore Quality Certificate; what I see before me is that he
only signed the document while acting in his capacity as an PPRA
official.
“It is not right in criminal cases to infer guilt without
concrete evidence, there is no proof that he was aware that the
documents were false.
“The prosecution have not been able to prove the case of forgery against the third defendant,” Justice Okunnu held, freeing Fakuade.
In finding Wagbatsoma and Ngo-Ngali guilty, the judge held, “The defendants defrauded the Federal Government of N340m in the third quarter of 2010 and N414m in the fourth quarter of 2010.
“According to a forensic audit by Akintola Williams Delloitte,
the defendants did not remit an excess of N754million to the Federal
Government.
“The first defendant knowingly received the sum in excess of
what the fourth defendant (Ontario Oil and Gas Limited) was entitled to.
“In my opinion, he contributed to the false pretence.”
Justice Okunnu further held, “The second defendant is the MD of
the company, she is the alter – ego of the fourth defendant and was
aware of the going ons of the company.”
After pronouncing his client guilty, Ngo-Ngali’s lawyer, Mr. E.D. Onyeke urged Justice Okunnu to temper justice with mercy.
“The second defendant has health challenges, in the course of
the trial she has had cause to visit doctors abroad to take care of her
health issues as the health care system in Nigeria is poor.
“As the MD, she is an employer of labour whose workers depend
on her managerial abilities, her workers will suffer more than necessary
especially in this period of recession,” Onyeke pleaded.
“It is our humble plea that court grants her a custodial sentence starting from the day she was arraigned,” he added.
Responding, however, the prosecutor, Jacobs, said, “The minimum sentence of the offences which the convicts have been convicted is seven years.
“A custodial sentence will be sending a wrong signal to the
public that the rich cannot go to prison and will be a hindrance to our
fight against corruption.
“There is also no medical report regarding the alleged ill
health of the defendant and the prison has medical facilities, if they
can provide for the poor, they can provide for the rich.”
No comments:
Post a Comment